Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Martin County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,048
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Martin County, Minnesota totaled $66,656,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lana Morris | Welcome, MN 56181 | $309,455 |
22 | Gaalswyk Bros | Trimont, MN 56176 | $309,077 |
23 | Laue Farms | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $305,018 |
24 | Lunz Farms Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $303,566 |
25 | Eastfork Farm Corp | Ceylon, MN 56121 | $297,900 |
26 | Brockmann Bros | Granada, MN 56039 | $297,539 |
27 | Neusch Farms Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $288,206 |
28 | Paul T Hein | Welcome, MN 56181 | $286,432 |
29 | Esb Farm Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $285,257 |
30 | Windmill Farm Partnership | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $281,452 |
31 | Max Simmons | Alpha, MN 56111 | $278,850 |
32 | Tad Alan Engstrom | Dunnell, MN 56127 | $265,684 |
33 | Mule Town Farms Ptnrs | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $264,909 |
34 | Rgd Farms Partnership | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $264,511 |
35 | Airborne Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $261,033 |
36 | Butler Farms Inc | Winnebago, MN 56098 | $260,661 |
37 | L B Pork Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $259,100 |
38 | Tony Weihe | Truman, MN 56088 | $258,855 |
39 | Gary E Hanson | Granada, MN 56039 | $254,223 |
40 | Elm Creek Acres Inc | Trimont, MN 56176 | $252,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”