Total Emergency Relief Program in Meeker County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 231
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Meeker County, Minnesota totaled $7,226,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Luvern J Becker Jr | Eden Valley, MN 55329 | $13,631 |
122 | Isaac Thomas Jones | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $13,181 |
123 | Thomas D Miller | Grove City, MN 56243 | $13,128 |
124 | Cody Francis Lange | Litchfield, MN 55355 | $13,000 |
125 | Samantha Anderson | Grove City, MN 56243 | $12,969 |
126 | Verlyce Runke French | Hutchinson, MN 55350 | $12,963 |
127 | Willard W Piepenburg | Litchfield, MN 55355 | $12,905 |
128 | Heid Brothers Harvesting Inc | Kimball, MN 55353 | $12,805 |
129 | Rosaline Ratike | Litchfield, MN 55355 | $12,768 |
130 | Eric Grimsgard | Grove City, MN 56243 | $12,445 |
131 | Cindy L Miller | Dassel, MN 55325 | $12,430 |
132 | Vernon Berg | Watkins, MN 55389 | $12,237 |
133 | Hulterstrum Brothers Inc | Litchfield, MN 55355 | $12,190 |
134 | Warren M Johnson | Tempe, AZ 85284 | $12,161 |
135 | Leon Bredeson | Atwater, MN 56209 | $12,140 |
136 | Dean C Stenberg | Grove City, MN 56243 | $12,021 |
137 | , | $11,856 | |
138 | Jeffrey J Peterson | Dassel, MN 55325 | $11,837 |
139 | Dale A Heinrichs | Hutchinson, MN 55350 | $11,529 |
140 | Beverly Bipes | Litchfield, MN 55355 | $11,524 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”