Market Gains in Morrison County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 157
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Morrison County, Minnesota totaled $1,142,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ted Pietrowski | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $6,900 |
42 | Daniel D Dickmann | Pierz, MN 56364 | $6,847 |
43 | Frederick Alois Herzog | Randall, MN 56475 | $6,523 |
44 | Roger Leo Blonigen | Albany, MN 56307 | $6,485 |
45 | Ronald J Czech | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $6,418 |
46 | Bill Herold | Pierz, MN 56364 | $6,339 |
47 | Delmer Sobiech | Bowlus, MN 56314 | $6,252 |
48 | Harold Heinz | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $6,190 |
49 | John Schulte | Burtrum, MN 56318 | $5,701 |
50 | Roger Schulte | Burtrum, MN 56318 | $5,701 |
51 | Debra Brummer | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $5,470 |
52 | Duane F Meyer | Pierz, MN 56364 | $5,371 |
53 | Jerome Koval | Randall, MN 56475 | $5,342 |
54 | Keith L Winscher | Pierz, MN 56364 | $5,205 |
55 | Michael Klisch Jr | Saint Joseph, MN 56374 | $4,918 |
56 | Allan Feirer | Bowlus, MN 56314 | $4,896 |
57 | Gerald Richard Blonigen | Holdingford, MN 56340 | $4,816 |
58 | Thomas J Smude | Pierz, MN 56364 | $4,669 |
59 | Carl A Piekarski | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $4,527 |
60 | Bartkowitz Hog Farm | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $4,487 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”