Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Mower County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 113
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Mower County, Minnesota totaled $213,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William A Fenholt | Charles City, IA 50616 | $1,500 |
62 | Katherine Baudler Estate | , 00000 | $1,471 |
63 | Richard C Baudler Estate | , 00000 | $1,471 |
64 | M & L Farms | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $1,437 |
65 | Janice M Uhrich | Acworth, GA 30101 | $1,347 |
66 | Robert David Uhrich | Omaha, NE 68127 | $1,347 |
67 | Marvin J Miller | Adams, MN 55909 | $1,300 |
68 | James R Anderson | Apple Valley, MN 55124 | $1,251 |
69 | John Hjelmeland | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,196 |
70 | Victor Slowinski | Brownsdale, MN 55918 | $1,190 |
71 | Ozro H Brown | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,151 |
72 | James A May | Adams, MN 55909 | $1,089 |
73 | Eleanor Thatcher | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $1,085 |
74 | Richard Thatcher | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $1,085 |
75 | Lloyd Skifter | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $1,050 |
76 | Sydney Magnuson | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,033 |
77 | Joseph Vogt | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $991 |
78 | Leonard Vogt | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $990 |
79 | Doran Kasel | Austin, MN 55912 | $989 |
80 | Robert L Clark | Austin, MN 55912 | $895 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”