Conservation Reserve Program in Mower County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 553
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mower County, Minnesota totaled $2,704,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Clouse Family Farms | Rochester, MN 55903 | $7,429 |
102 | Dennis J Runkle | Racine, MN 55967 | $7,233 |
103 | Thomas Berge | Rochester, MN 55904 | $7,036 |
104 | Shawn E Fasbender | Adams, MN 55909 | $6,872 |
105 | David O Englehart Trust | Marietta, GA 30064 | $6,810 |
106 | Leone M Friedrichsen Credit Trust | Farmington, MN 55024 | $6,670 |
107 | Steven R Gleason | Austin, MN 55912 | $6,646 |
108 | Leon - Leon & Dorothy Revoc Liv Tr Steinkamp | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $6,584 |
109 | Jay Peterson | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $6,500 |
110 | Kathryn Jane Caldbeck | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $6,420 |
111 | Bradley Hines | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $6,418 |
112 | Judith Marie Schwartz | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $6,286 |
113 | , | $6,170 | |
114 | Larry Lowe | Austin, MN 55912 | $6,159 |
115 | Edmund L Emerick | Waltham, MN 55982 | $6,115 |
116 | , | $6,102 | |
117 | Bruce Bungum | Sargeant, MN 55973 | $5,856 |
118 | Timothy Torgerson | Nye, MT 59061 | $5,791 |
119 | Dolores M Frank Irrevoc Trust | Lyle, MN 55953 | $5,662 |
120 | Edward B Mcmenomy Rev Trust | Rosemount, MN 55068 | $5,653 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”