Farm Subsidy information
Mower County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Mower County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,478
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mower County, Minnesota totaled $611,130,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mj Merten Ptr | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,618,411 |
22 | Four Way Farm Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $1,587,243 |
23 | Bruce Nelsen | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $1,570,634 |
24 | Craig A Nelsen | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $1,569,685 |
25 | Richard R Neuvirth | Elkton, MN 55933 | $1,568,096 |
26 | Miller's Blue Ridge Farm | Riceville, IA 50466 | $1,556,929 |
27 | Wendy G Jones | Brownsdale, MN 55918 | $1,549,753 |
28 | Gary Angell | Elkton, MN 55933 | $1,543,925 |
29 | Mrj Farms Of Waltham Inc | Waltham, MN 55982 | $1,531,046 |
30 | Dominic F Stier | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $1,511,213 |
31 | Duane Wigham | Adams, MN 55909 | $1,509,250 |
32 | Smith Family Farms Llp | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $1,499,316 |
33 | Peter Tangren Rev Trust | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,483,663 |
34 | Sue A Dougan | Ostrander, MN 55961 | $1,472,559 |
35 | Mark J Wolterman | Adams, MN 55909 | $1,462,444 |
36 | Dennis Loucks | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,447,144 |
37 | Craig Goodsell | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $1,429,182 |
38 | Ronald C Vogt | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $1,422,497 |
39 | Mark Carman | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $1,417,987 |
40 | Robert Wolterman | Adams, MN 55909 | $1,406,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”