Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Murray County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 176
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Murray County, Minnesota totaled $364,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David Talsma | Chandler, MN 56122 | $808 |
62 | Roger Steinman | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $764 |
63 | Aaron Kluis | Chandler, MN 56122 | $764 |
64 | Mike Kluis | Chandler, MN 56122 | $764 |
65 | Ivan Van Peursem | Chandler, MN 56122 | $738 |
66 | Bruce Van Peursem | Chandler, MN 56122 | $738 |
67 | Jd Hog Farms Inc. | Tea, SD 57064 | $704 |
68 | Leslie De Groot | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $672 |
69 | David C Robbins | Tracy, MN 56175 | $669 |
70 | Harris Sankey | Chandler, MN 56122 | $656 |
71 | Duane Reitsma | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $648 |
72 | Mark Beek | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $648 |
73 | Douglas Charles Christiansen | Balaton, MN 56115 | $632 |
74 | William Olivier | Chandler, MN 56122 | $614 |
75 | Schreier Brothers | Slayton, MN 56172 | $610 |
76 | Risacher Brothers | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $597 |
77 | Theo Van Peursem | Leota, MN 56153 | $587 |
78 | Patrick V Lingen | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $570 |
79 | Marlin Beers | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $550 |
80 | Richard Hennings | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $528 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”