Total Conservation Programs in Murray County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 673
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Murray County, Minnesota totaled $2,545,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michael Luschen | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $8,327 |
82 | Michael Schreier | Avoca, MN 56114 | $8,249 |
83 | Leslie De Groot | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $8,089 |
84 | Daryl L Johnson | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $7,881 |
85 | Ronald Dahl | Tracy, MN 56175 | $7,860 |
86 | Fred H Widboom | Slayton, MN 56172 | $7,812 |
87 | Robert J Pohlen | Tracy, MN 56175 | $7,720 |
88 | Larry J Meyer | Slayton, MN 56172 | $7,633 |
89 | Green Acres Of Murray Co Llp | Slayton, MN 56172 | $7,515 |
90 | Dustin Krick | Westbrook, MN 56183 | $7,420 |
91 | Glenn And Elaine Degroot Revocable Trust | Centennial, CO 80112 | $7,343 |
92 | Dale Schmidt Jr And Kathy R Schmidt Irrev Trust | Garvin, MN 56132 | $7,280 |
93 | Robert Ankrum | Tracy, MN 56175 | $7,196 |
94 | Dawn M Christensen | Slayton, MN 56172 | $7,139 |
95 | Lora Johnson | Balaton, MN 56115 | $7,036 |
96 | Raphael G Metz | Windom, MN 56101 | $7,019 |
97 | Priebe Prairie Desmesne B LLC | Marshall, MN 56258 | $7,018 |
98 | Priebe Prairie Desmesne C LLC | Marshall, MN 56258 | $7,010 |
99 | Robert Schelhaas | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $6,904 |
100 | Jason Wentzel | Lake Wilson, MN 56151 | $6,718 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”