Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 330
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $1,045,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John G Palmer Living Trust | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $10,221 |
22 | Travis D Havemeier | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $10,072 |
23 | L & S Farms Inc | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $9,674 |
24 | Richard C Wettergren | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $9,262 |
25 | Thomas E Brown | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $9,167 |
26 | Craig L Smith Sr | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $8,999 |
27 | Craig W Schwab | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $8,585 |
28 | Mark T Berle | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $8,339 |
29 | Bruce D Hewitt | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $7,940 |
30 | Craig L Smith Jr | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $7,873 |
31 | D & A Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,867 |
32 | Mark Michael Osborne Estate | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $7,564 |
33 | Allen Berg | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,360 |
34 | Stuart F Bruns | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $7,333 |
35 | Karen M Annexstad | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $7,296 |
36 | Joseph P Maidl | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $7,145 |
37 | Richard H Willaert | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $7,103 |
38 | William C Lambert | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $6,786 |
39 | Dale R Hiniker | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $6,765 |
40 | Lloyd W Voges | Courtland, MN 56021 | $6,737 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”