Deficiency Payment in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 705
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $3,057,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wallace Molitor | Mankato, MN 56001 | $13,175 |
42 | Wayne M Molitor | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $13,175 |
43 | Jerome M Peters | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $12,739 |
44 | Steve & Mark Herberg Gp | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $12,482 |
45 | Theodore C Portner | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $12,199 |
46 | Roger Matthew Michels | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $11,999 |
47 | Dale Monson | Winthrop, MN 55396 | $11,726 |
48 | David L Martin | Gaylord, MN 55334 | $11,538 |
49 | Sandra Lee Martin | Gaylord, MN 55334 | $11,538 |
50 | James Friederichs | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $11,523 |
51 | John A Johnson | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $11,473 |
52 | Gerard P Gaalswyk | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $11,443 |
53 | Allen John Quist | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $11,316 |
54 | Scott G Annexstad | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $11,310 |
55 | Perry Meyer Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $11,161 |
56 | Duane Hiniker | Mankato, MN 56001 | $11,132 |
57 | Meyer & Meyer Farms Inc | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $11,078 |
58 | David B Mogensen | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $10,955 |
59 | Duane K Eckberg | Winthrop, MN 55396 | $10,933 |
60 | Thomas G Conlon | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $10,725 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”