Deficiency Payment in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 705
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $3,057,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Frederick J Kienlen Living Trust Dtd Oct 26 2010 | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $9,506 |
82 | Kevin J Michels Sr | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $9,496 |
83 | Henry F Martens | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $9,404 |
84 | Mark Michael Osborne Estate | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $9,334 |
85 | Merton Wenner | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $9,229 |
86 | Steven Robert Wenner | St Peter, MN 56082 | $9,225 |
87 | Bradley Clement Wenner | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $9,225 |
88 | Havemeier Farms | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $9,152 |
89 | Gordon R Rodning | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $8,914 |
90 | William T Schwab | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $8,884 |
91 | Elmer Epke | Courtland, MN 56021 | $8,880 |
92 | Clifford H Wenner | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $8,873 |
93 | Kevin Tungsvik | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $8,863 |
94 | Roger G Bruns | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $8,840 |
95 | Dale R Hiniker | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $8,763 |
96 | Russell Hoehn | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $8,736 |
97 | Willard A Hoehn Jr | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $8,736 |
98 | Leroy B Rathmann | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $8,625 |
99 | Larry A Krohn | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $8,610 |
100 | Beverly Thorn | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $8,498 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”