Deficiency Payment in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 705
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $3,057,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | M Lee Schott | Gaylord, MN 55334 | $8,427 |
102 | William Depuydt | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $8,239 |
103 | David & Donald Wendinger | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $8,232 |
104 | Robert E Forst | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $8,217 |
105 | Delores Hager Estate | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $8,182 |
106 | Michael A Webster | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $8,164 |
107 | Timm Farms Inc | Mankato, MN 56001 | $8,152 |
108 | Thomas S Veigel | Belview, MN 56214 | $8,134 |
109 | Hopp Farms Partnership | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $8,070 |
110 | Marvin W Gieseke | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $8,024 |
111 | David & Peter Seitzer Farm Partne | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $7,982 |
112 | Richard B Halverson | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $7,913 |
113 | Sjostrom Farms Llp | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $7,839 |
114 | Fitzner Brothers Inc | Courtland, MN 56021 | $7,817 |
115 | Gary R Hayer | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $7,787 |
116 | Allan L Hopp | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $7,731 |
117 | Krohn's Hilltop Farms Inc | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $7,722 |
118 | Bruce And Steven Hulke Partnership Llp | Courtland, MN 56021 | $7,682 |
119 | Stanley Johnson Estate | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $7,670 |
120 | Elroy C Webster Jr Estate | Chanhassen, MN 55317 | $7,649 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”