Loan Deficiency in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 856
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $34,413,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mark Michael Osborne Estate | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $94,541 |
102 | Richard T Meurer | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $94,383 |
103 | Kenneth Drill | Courtland, MN 56021 | $94,377 |
104 | Lester F Oswald | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $94,078 |
105 | Daniel V Pettis | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $92,548 |
106 | Gold Crest Farms Inc | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $92,040 |
107 | Fitzner Brothers Inc | Courtland, MN 56021 | $91,782 |
108 | Frederick J Kienlen Living Trust Dtd Oct 26 2010 | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $89,962 |
109 | Cjn Farms Lp | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $88,970 |
110 | Duane H Gran | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $88,962 |
111 | Bruce D Hewitt | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $87,699 |
112 | The Ridgebrook Co | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $86,886 |
113 | James Otto | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $86,476 |
114 | Loren R Bruns | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $86,087 |
115 | Arden P Enter | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $85,401 |
116 | High Point Farms LLC | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $85,057 |
117 | Larry D Thompson | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $84,568 |
118 | John P Mertesdorf | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $84,286 |
119 | Mark B Forst | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $83,912 |
120 | Shady Lane Acres Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $83,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”