Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 646
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $681,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ralph L Bode | Courtland, MN 56021 | $1,600 |
122 | Perry Meyer Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $1,591 |
123 | Lynn Dale Bode | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $1,558 |
124 | William T Schwab | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $1,548 |
125 | Steve & Mark Herberg Gp | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $1,502 |
126 | Joseph E Conlon | Mankato, MN 56001 | $1,477 |
127 | Greenridge Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $1,465 |
128 | Leon T Maidl | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $1,454 |
129 | Leroy B Rathmann | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $1,342 |
130 | Glen Hoffmann | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $1,337 |
131 | Mark L Hoffmann | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $1,337 |
132 | Kimberly J Zimmerman | Courtland, MN 56021 | $1,327 |
133 | Mark R Frankamp | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $1,325 |
134 | Lance O Zimmerman | Courtland, MN 56021 | $1,322 |
135 | Robert M Wilkinson | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $1,284 |
136 | Roger Wilkinson | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $1,258 |
137 | Burnett Land Company LLC | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $1,253 |
138 | Loren R Bruns | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $1,250 |
139 | Todd A Nelson | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $1,240 |
140 | Marvin Nissel | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $1,230 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”