Conservation Reserve Program in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 626
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $15,410,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Charles V Turnbull Rev Trust | St Peter, MN 56082 | $31,247 |
122 | Gloria M Turnbull Rev Trust | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $31,245 |
123 | Michael Bastian | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $31,028 |
124 | Peter M Anthony | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $31,014 |
125 | Helen A Brown | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $30,563 |
126 | Michael Osborne | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $30,323 |
127 | Michael Goodell | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $29,852 |
128 | Robert Gleisner | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $29,477 |
129 | Phillip Fredrick Wingen | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $29,476 |
130 | Mary Langhorst | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $28,768 |
131 | Edward P Wager | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $28,511 |
132 | Karl H Johnson | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $28,383 |
133 | Paul C Johnson | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $28,382 |
134 | Gina Meyer | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $28,331 |
135 | Dorothy Anthony | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $28,095 |
136 | Karen Wingen | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $27,936 |
137 | Carl M Johnson Rev Trust | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $27,487 |
138 | David Rengstorf | Courtland, MN 56021 | $27,487 |
139 | Mathiowetz Family Farm 2 Llp | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $27,452 |
140 | Duane K Eckberg | Winthrop, MN 55396 | $27,415 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”