Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 646
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $681,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Clifford H Wenner | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $1,130 |
142 | Terry D Holtz | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $1,110 |
143 | Christopher M Conlon | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $1,101 |
144 | Christopher A Koller | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $1,101 |
145 | Joanne Bode | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $1,095 |
146 | Thomas O Martens | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $1,091 |
147 | Paul J Johnson | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $1,081 |
148 | Gregory J Merkel | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $1,080 |
149 | Jacob Matthew Yost | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $1,050 |
150 | Frederick Becker | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $1,024 |
151 | Helen Pehrson | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $1,014 |
152 | David Brandel | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $969 |
153 | Steven Bastian | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $963 |
154 | Margaret Forst | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $961 |
155 | Gary J Gintner | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $948 |
156 | Merle J Brinkman Trust | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $934 |
157 | Roger L Johnson | Winthrop, MN 55396 | $903 |
158 | Timothy Kennedy | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $894 |
159 | Stanley J Schugel | Courtland, MN 56021 | $890 |
160 | William C Lambert | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”