Farm Subsidy information
Nicollet County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Nicollet County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 581
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nicollet County, Minnesota totaled $11,214,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hagberg Farms | Lafayette, MN 56054 | $62,953 |
22 | Mark J Bastian | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $62,610 |
23 | Loren L Weisensel | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $61,085 |
24 | L & W Farms Partnership | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $60,581 |
25 | Steven Bastian | Fairfax, MN 55332 | $59,866 |
26 | High Point Farms LLC | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $58,473 |
27 | Timothy J Braun | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $57,242 |
28 | Peter T Seitzer | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $56,695 |
29 | Lynn P Forst | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $55,739 |
30 | Brandes Swan Lake Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $55,134 |
31 | Craig L Smith Jr | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $53,553 |
32 | Christopher F Krohn | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $52,597 |
33 | Steve & Mark Herberg Gp | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $49,520 |
34 | James Fallenstein | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $49,442 |
35 | Molitor Farms Inc | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $47,804 |
36 | Patrick J Anderley | St Peter, MN 56082 | $46,602 |
37 | Samantha J Anderley | St Peter, MN 56082 | $46,601 |
38 | Perry Meyer Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $45,180 |
39 | Forst Farms Inc | Gibbon, MN 55335 | $45,069 |
40 | Bjorklund Bros | Nicollet, MN 56074 | $43,609 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”