Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Nobles County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,350
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Nobles County, Minnesota totaled $56,172,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Roger Teerink | Worthington, MN 56187 | $105,926 |
142 | Dan Mulder | Ellsworth, MN 56129 | $105,604 |
143 | Jet Farms LLC | Worthington, MN 56187 | $104,749 |
144 | Ryan Hoftyzer | Rushmore, MN 56168 | $103,934 |
145 | Michael Wolf | Adrian, MN 56110 | $103,768 |
146 | Christopher R Wieneke | Adrian, MN 56110 | $103,407 |
147 | Harlan Klein | Reading, MN 56165 | $102,826 |
148 | Dan Block | Adrian, MN 56110 | $102,128 |
149 | Gary Rodrigue | Lismore, MN 56155 | $101,356 |
150 | Norman A Klein | Reading, MN 56165 | $100,635 |
151 | Dean Christopherson | Worthington, MN 56187 | $100,126 |
152 | Lance Rogers | Wilmont, MN 56185 | $99,649 |
153 | David Henning | Fulda, MN 56131 | $99,072 |
154 | B & R Farms | Wilmont, MN 56185 | $98,557 |
155 | Van Dyke Dairy Heifers LLC | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $98,278 |
156 | Kelvin Vande Kamp | Worthington, MN 56187 | $98,065 |
157 | Mark Croat | Rushmore, MN 56168 | $98,001 |
158 | Gerald Pieper | Rushmore, MN 56168 | $96,774 |
159 | Franklin R Kunze | Worthington, MN 56187 | $95,912 |
160 | Dean Hokeness | Rushmore, MN 56168 | $95,358 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”