Counter Cyclical Program in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,106
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $9,292,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael Dale Brooks | Byron, MN 55920 | $56,201 |
22 | Ronald James Allen | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $56,065 |
23 | Randall Ralph Hart | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $54,968 |
24 | Timothy Jay Griffin | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $52,564 |
25 | Brenda Decook | Byron, MN 55920 | $49,805 |
26 | Bryce D Decook | Byron, MN 55920 | $49,805 |
27 | Whitcomb Family Farms | Eyota, MN 55934 | $49,678 |
28 | Brian Arthur Kaul | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $49,634 |
29 | Joseph Arthur Bianchi | Elgin, MN 55932 | $49,203 |
30 | Penny Lou Bianchi | Elgin, MN 55932 | $49,203 |
31 | Michael Todd Brass | Rochester, MN 55904 | $48,433 |
32 | James Vermilya | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $47,454 |
33 | Matthew M Sell Farms Inc | Plainview, MN 55964 | $47,063 |
34 | Jeffrey Robert Schoenfelder | Rochester, MN 55904 | $46,474 |
35 | John Paul Schoenfelder | Rochester, MN 55904 | $46,469 |
36 | William Harvey Schmidt | Rochester, MN 55906 | $46,321 |
37 | Donley Farms Inc | Byron, MN 55920 | $46,047 |
38 | James D Paulson | Rochester, MN 55902 | $45,738 |
39 | Gary Lee Miller | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $45,001 |
40 | Curtis Kroening | Rochester, MN 55906 | $43,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”