Direct Payment Program in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,504
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $46,098,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kevin John Scanlan | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | $188,609 |
42 | Michael Todd Brass | Rochester, MN 55904 | $187,932 |
43 | Boyd Steven Gasner Jr | Eyota, MN 55934 | $187,855 |
44 | Daley Farms Llp | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $187,224 |
45 | Matthew M Sell Farms Inc | Plainview, MN 55964 | $183,322 |
46 | Jeffrey Robert Schoenfelder | Rochester, MN 55904 | $183,181 |
47 | John Paul Schoenfelder | Rochester, MN 55904 | $183,029 |
48 | Kenneth Andrew Oehlke | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $180,854 |
49 | Theodore William Klassen | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $180,077 |
50 | Gail Rosalyn Klassen | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $180,077 |
51 | Tamera Jean Schmidt | Rochester, MN 55906 | $179,424 |
52 | Thomas Curtis Kroening | Rochester, MN 55906 | $178,086 |
53 | Michael Richard Bale | Byron, MN 55920 | $176,686 |
54 | Donald Logan Thompson | Plainview, MN 55964 | $176,247 |
55 | Dean Mark Michel | Zumbro Falls, MN 55991 | $173,554 |
56 | Brubaker Farms | Dover, MN 55929 | $173,078 |
57 | Rose Marie Heim | Dover, MN 55929 | $171,217 |
58 | Robert Joseph Heim | Dover, MN 55929 | $171,217 |
59 | Angela Decook | Byron, MN 55920 | $170,576 |
60 | Jessup Decook | Byron, MN 55920 | $170,476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”