Farm Subsidy information
Olmsted County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 573
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $9,496,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Monica G. Griffin Trust | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $14,296 |
62 | Joan Jordahl | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $14,291 |
63 | North Creek Dairy LLC | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $14,216 |
64 | Mark Holmes | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $14,020 |
65 | Clyde Vehrenkamp | Eyota, MN 55934 | $13,357 |
66 | Alrick Shady Oak Farm LLC | Walker, MN 56484 | $13,326 |
67 | Mark Leitzen | Rochester, MN 55901 | $13,265 |
68 | Daniel Thomas Griffin | Rochester, MN 55904 | $13,169 |
69 | Rudolph Edwin Kaehler | Eyota, MN 55934 | $12,926 |
70 | Duane Quam Sr | Byron, MN 55920 | $12,818 |
71 | Bar L Stable | Eyota, MN 55934 | $12,498 |
72 | Jason Bernard | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $12,458 |
73 | John B Teske | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $12,285 |
74 | James A Miller | Wabasha, MN 55981 | $12,264 |
75 | Keith Douglas | Byron, MN 55920 | $12,185 |
76 | Eleanor Thatcher | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $12,184 |
77 | Gerald Benike | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $12,148 |
78 | David Howard Coolidge | Rochester, MN 55904 | $12,092 |
79 | Keith E Kisro | Dover, MN 55929 | $12,053 |
80 | Nistler Farms Of Rochester LLC | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $11,894 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”