Direct Payment Program in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,504
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $46,098,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gar-lin Management Inc | Eyota, MN 55934 | $169,740 |
62 | Curtis Kroening | Rochester, MN 55906 | $166,383 |
63 | Anthony J Rossman | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $163,455 |
64 | John Eugene Allen | Eyota, MN 55934 | $162,929 |
65 | Wendt Farms Of Eyota Inc | Eyota, MN 55934 | $159,741 |
66 | Dale William Hinckley | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $159,371 |
67 | Matthew Peter Flynn | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $159,217 |
68 | Edward Michael Twohey | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $158,325 |
69 | Frederick Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $157,361 |
70 | Frank Fredrick Kahn Jr | Elgin, MN 55932 | $156,340 |
71 | Eric Charles Decook | Byron, MN 55920 | $155,827 |
72 | James Jeffery Palmby | Dover, MN 55929 | $155,686 |
73 | Hinkle Farms Inc | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $154,698 |
74 | Dennis Fritsch | Rochester, MN 55904 | $154,599 |
75 | Tom Fritsch | Rochester, MN 55904 | $154,587 |
76 | Benike Farms Of Elgin | Elgin, MN 55932 | $152,426 |
77 | Terrance Alan King | Rochester, MN 55902 | $151,680 |
78 | Raymond R Hampel | Elgin, MN 55932 | $150,054 |
79 | Storm Farms Ltd | Dover, MN 55929 | $148,794 |
80 | James Vermilya | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $146,588 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”