Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 184
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $552,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bryan Keith Todd | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $2,090 |
82 | James Kreidermacher | Dover, MN 55929 | $2,086 |
83 | Quincy Valley Farm | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $2,044 |
84 | Robert Schunke | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $2,029 |
85 | Donald L Millard | Dover, MN 55929 | $1,883 |
86 | Louis E Ward Jr | Byron, MN 55920 | $1,860 |
87 | Roy Haney | Rochester, MN 55906 | $1,848 |
88 | , | $1,784 | |
89 | David Howard Coolidge | Rochester, MN 55904 | $1,724 |
90 | Ardean Ambrose Bjornson | Kasson, MN 55944 | $1,686 |
91 | Charles Passe | Rochester, MN 55902 | $1,686 |
92 | Michael Bruce | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $1,671 |
93 | David Quam | Byron, MN 55920 | $1,637 |
94 | Jason Bernard | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $1,629 |
95 | Horstmann Family Farms | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $1,565 |
96 | Nicholas R Feltis | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $1,558 |
97 | Michael Lloyd Blattner | Eyota, MN 55934 | $1,551 |
98 | David Mcguire | Dover, MN 55929 | $1,494 |
99 | Anthony Mcguire | Dover, MN 55929 | $1,494 |
100 | Mark Cochran | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $1,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”