Farm Subsidy information
Olmsted County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 573
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $9,496,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kevin L Hammel | Eyota, MN 55934 | $11,787 |
82 | Lee Jay Small | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $11,693 |
83 | Tina Christine Small | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $11,693 |
84 | William David Befort | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $11,565 |
85 | Jerry Francis Ohm | Rochester, MN 55906 | $11,526 |
86 | Terrance Sahl | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $11,492 |
87 | Russell Albert Hammel | Eyota, MN 55934 | $11,243 |
88 | Rodney Russell Allen | Rochester, MN 55904 | $10,985 |
89 | Thomas Duxbury | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $10,943 |
90 | James Vermilya | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $10,932 |
91 | James P Byrne | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $10,746 |
92 | Jesse Vollmer | Rochester, MN 55904 | $10,711 |
93 | Michael F Barker | Rochester, MN 55906 | $10,693 |
94 | Joan C Till-born | Byron, MN 55920 | $10,611 |
95 | Greta Meek | Rochester, MN 55906 | $10,529 |
96 | Shea Dairy Inc | Viola, MN 55934 | $10,452 |
97 | Hinckley Holsteins LLC | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $10,452 |
98 | Hidden Hill Dairy LLC | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $10,452 |
99 | Blue Horizon Farm Fam Ltd Ptr | Rochester, MN 55906 | $10,452 |
100 | Brian D Booker | Dover, MN 55929 | $10,424 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”