Production Flexibility Program in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,374
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $28,759,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Graham Properties Ltd | Rogers, MN 55374 | $79,654 |
82 | Martin Andrew Wagner | Elgin, MN 55932 | $78,588 |
83 | Dale L Thompson | Plainview, MN 55964 | $78,115 |
84 | Clarence Carl Franke | Eyota, MN 55934 | $77,742 |
85 | Edward Michael Twohey | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $77,541 |
86 | Frank Fredrick Kahn Jr | Elgin, MN 55932 | $77,371 |
87 | Laurie - Laurie Balo Balow | Lake City, MN 55041 | $77,152 |
88 | David - David Balow Balow | Lake City, MN 55041 | $77,150 |
89 | James Edward Vrieze | Eyota, MN 55934 | $77,089 |
90 | Bruce Allen Levan | Elgin, MN 55932 | $77,066 |
91 | James Rucker | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $76,371 |
92 | Anthony Koenig | Rochester, MN 55906 | $76,165 |
93 | Grant Larson | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $76,159 |
94 | William Henry Oehlke | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $75,887 |
95 | Gerald David Wendt | Eyota, MN 55934 | $75,579 |
96 | Naomi May Andrist | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $75,566 |
97 | Schroeder Brothers Inc | Elgin, MN 55932 | $75,502 |
98 | Betty Ohm | Elgin, MN 55932 | $74,498 |
99 | Ernest H Christie | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $73,782 |
100 | Randall Ralph Hart | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $73,680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”