Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 427
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $936,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Stephen Uthke | Eyota, MN 55934 | $2,579 |
102 | Michael Bruce | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $2,549 |
103 | Michael Frost | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $2,511 |
104 | Curtis Kroening | Rochester, MN 55906 | $2,470 |
105 | Thomas Curtis Kroening | Rochester, MN 55906 | $2,470 |
106 | Thomas L Ellringer | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $2,455 |
107 | Lloyd Greenlee | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $2,429 |
108 | Stanley Hanson | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $2,421 |
109 | Matthew A Hanson | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $2,421 |
110 | Jerome Walch | Rochester, MN 55906 | $2,417 |
111 | Larry Rabe | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $2,410 |
112 | Daniel Thomas Griffin | Rochester, MN 55904 | $2,400 |
113 | Nathan Redalen | Rochester, MN 55904 | $2,386 |
114 | Bailey Brothers | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $2,376 |
115 | Ronald R Heins | Eyota, MN 55934 | $2,358 |
116 | Louis Wegman | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $2,345 |
117 | William Dux | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $2,327 |
118 | Dale Leroy Bedtka | Dover, MN 55929 | $2,321 |
119 | David Webster | Rochester, MN 55906 | $2,303 |
120 | Jimmie John King | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $2,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”