Direct Payment Program in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,504
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $46,098,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Elmer H Stock | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $105,449 |
122 | Gary Dale Tesmer | Eyota, MN 55934 | $105,109 |
123 | William Herbert Fieseler | Eyota, MN 55934 | $104,460 |
124 | Paul Pyfferoen | Byron, MN 55920 | $103,724 |
125 | John L Madden | Eyota, MN 55934 | $103,488 |
126 | Keith E Kisro | Dover, MN 55929 | $103,253 |
127 | Clemens Farm | Eyota, MN 55934 | $100,633 |
128 | Kenneth Harold Zitzow | Dover, MN 55929 | $100,357 |
129 | James M Bedtke | Dover, MN 55929 | $99,234 |
130 | William Henry Oehlke | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $98,863 |
131 | Larry Eugene Brubaker | Dover, MN 55929 | $98,576 |
132 | Manco Of Fairmont Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $96,995 |
133 | Michael Connelly | Byron, MN 55920 | $96,365 |
134 | Kirkland I Finseth | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $96,330 |
135 | Dale L Donlinger | Rochester, MN 55904 | $96,249 |
136 | Edward David Miller | Rochester, MN 55906 | $94,816 |
137 | Gregory Dale Hinkle | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $93,677 |
138 | Patrick James Clemens | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $91,697 |
139 | Richard Vehrenkamp | Dover, MN 55929 | $91,627 |
140 | Robert James Eustice | Byron, MN 55920 | $91,558 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”