Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 179
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $812,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bryan John Decook | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $4,695 |
42 | Robert Anthony Schimek | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $4,578 |
43 | Theodore William Klassen | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $4,532 |
44 | Gail Rosalyn Klassen | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $4,532 |
45 | Reginald M Hart Revocable Inter-v | Elgin, MN 55932 | $4,519 |
46 | James J Lehmann | Rochester, MN 55906 | $4,500 |
47 | Michael Connelly | Byron, MN 55920 | $4,497 |
48 | Charles Deceased Jackson | Farmington, MN 55024 | $4,140 |
49 | Steven-triple T Orga Arlis Trogst | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $4,095 |
50 | Curtis Bolles | Byron, MN 55920 | $4,027 |
51 | Eugene Donald Peters | Rochester, MN 55902 | $4,006 |
52 | Gilman Halbakken | Dover, MN 55929 | $4,006 |
53 | Tom A Pyfferoen | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $3,529 |
54 | David Lee Groteluschen | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $3,500 |
55 | Dale L Thompson | Plainview, MN 55964 | $3,500 |
56 | Gerald Lawler | Eyota, MN 55934 | $3,500 |
57 | Gary L Dahl | Rochester, MN 55906 | $3,500 |
58 | John Jackson | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $3,500 |
59 | Gary L Pedersen | Dover, MN 55929 | $3,500 |
60 | John F Keefe | Rochester, MN 55906 | $3,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”