Farm Subsidy information
Olmsted County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,024
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $17,057,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dbtmk Limited Partnership | Rochester, MN 55904 | $96,918 |
22 | Matthew Dale Hinckley | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $93,892 |
23 | Eldon Wilbur Malwitz | Elgin, MN 55932 | $93,046 |
24 | Michael Steve Thompson | Rochester, MN 55906 | $92,809 |
25 | Lynne Marie Thompson | Rochester, MN 55906 | $92,809 |
26 | Blue Horizon Farm Fam Ltd Ptr | Rochester, MN 55906 | $89,669 |
27 | Adam Rucker | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $89,530 |
28 | Debra Sue Decook | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $83,309 |
29 | Daniel Ralph Keefe | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $81,719 |
30 | Donley Farms Inc | Byron, MN 55920 | $80,829 |
31 | Borst Family Dairy LLC | Rochester, MN 55904 | $79,576 |
32 | Hidden Hill Dairy LLC | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $79,453 |
33 | Brian Paul Connelly | Oronoco, MN 55960 | $78,422 |
34 | Frank Fredrick Kahn Jr | Elgin, MN 55932 | $75,779 |
35 | Hinkle Farms Inc | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $71,250 |
36 | Donald Edwin Bicknese | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $71,055 |
37 | Edward Michael Twohey | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $70,120 |
38 | Jessup Decook | Byron, MN 55920 | $70,069 |
39 | Kts Farms LLC | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | $69,808 |
40 | Schroeder Brothers Inc | Elgin, MN 55932 | $65,974 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”