Conservation Reserve Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,827
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $67,889,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kieth Schwantz | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $205,311 |
22 | Victor Sonnenberg | Dent, MN 56528 | $203,275 |
23 | James A Nordbeck | Vergas, MN 56587 | $201,787 |
24 | Norman E Nelson Revocable Trust | Eagle Bend, MN 56446 | $201,507 |
25 | Donald T Lafferty | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $200,163 |
26 | Gerald R Piippo | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $183,887 |
27 | James Arvidson | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $182,030 |
28 | Leroy O Nelson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $177,368 |
29 | John A Saari | Henning, MN 56551 | $177,116 |
30 | Cary Mcgrane | Bluffton, MN 56518 | $174,842 |
31 | David Ebersviller | Vergas, MN 56587 | $174,788 |
32 | Bristow Ventures LLC | Sun City West, AZ 85375 | $174,522 |
33 | Duane Donley | Perham, MN 56573 | $173,982 |
34 | Lloyd Greenwood | Henning, MN 56551 | $172,675 |
35 | Michael E Dobson | Perham, MN 56573 | $172,565 |
36 | Dorothy Amundson | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $172,039 |
37 | Gregory Gjere | New Brighton, MN 55112 | $171,715 |
38 | Laurie Hanson-zelinsky | Battle Lake, MN 56515 | $171,163 |
39 | Herbert Kahilainen | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $170,488 |
40 | William Heidelberger | Frazee, MN 56544 | $168,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”