Conservation Reserve Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 847
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $2,340,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kathryn O Kastama Revocable Trust | Oakland, CA 94611 | $7,323 |
62 | Joseph H Niewind | Eagle Bend, MN 56446 | $7,284 |
63 | Timothy T Pearson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $7,146 |
64 | Dean Endres | Bluffton, MN 56518 | $6,839 |
65 | Marion Lake Property LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $6,826 |
66 | Autumn Acres | Perham, MN 56573 | $6,811 |
67 | , | $6,795 | |
68 | Joseph Loerzel | Perham, MN 56573 | $6,788 |
69 | Roger E Meyer | Frazee, MN 56544 | $6,783 |
70 | Frank Vorderbruggen | Perham, MN 56573 | $6,782 |
71 | Raymond Hendrickson | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $6,743 |
72 | Gregory M Brakefield | New Germany, MN 55367 | $6,700 |
73 | , | $6,645 | |
74 | Delbert Moske | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $6,628 |
75 | Herbert Kahilainen | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $6,620 |
76 | Douglas Koskiniemi | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $6,596 |
77 | Timmy Bristow | Henning, MN 56551 | $6,531 |
78 | Donald L Hoffmann | Wadena, MN 56482 | $6,526 |
79 | James A Carow | Clackamas, OR 97086 | $6,484 |
80 | Wayne M Hotchkiss | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $6,481 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”