Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 335
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $671,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas Hendrickx | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $2,181 |
82 | Ivan D Reinke | Wadena, MN 56482 | $2,116 |
83 | David Ebersviller | Vergas, MN 56587 | $2,112 |
84 | David Seifert | Perham, MN 56573 | $2,083 |
85 | Terry Keskitalo | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $2,068 |
86 | Dale Keskitalo | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $2,049 |
87 | Garys Dairy Inc | Henning, MN 56551 | $2,028 |
88 | Randy Roberts | Bluffton, MN 56518 | $2,025 |
89 | Jeffrey Palubicki | Perham, MN 56573 | $1,993 |
90 | Randy R Thompson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,960 |
91 | Daryl Zeise | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $1,959 |
92 | David Uhren | Vining, MN 56588 | $1,953 |
93 | Doug Hopwood | Dent, MN 56528 | $1,914 |
94 | Craig Berry | Perham, MN 56573 | $1,898 |
95 | Bradley Linder | Henning, MN 56551 | $1,852 |
96 | Stephanie A Yungbauer | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $1,837 |
97 | Lynn Simpson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,819 |
98 | Matthew A Simpson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,819 |
99 | Kyle J Keskitalo | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,813 |
100 | Brian Ehnert | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,771 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”