Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 335
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $671,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Benjamin Palubicki | Perham, MN 56573 | $1,729 |
102 | Virgil Bernu | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,689 |
103 | Tom Delaney | Grass Range, MT 59032 | $1,656 |
104 | Daryl Haarstick | Vergas, MN 56587 | $1,649 |
105 | Jason Greenwaldt | Henning, MN 56551 | $1,647 |
106 | Reed G Barthel | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,627 |
107 | Lamont Luhning | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $1,609 |
108 | Trevor O Hintzman | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,606 |
109 | Wayne L Perkins | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $1,595 |
110 | Michael Crabb | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $1,524 |
111 | Bryon Olson | Richville, MN 56576 | $1,516 |
112 | Keith Aho | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $1,487 |
113 | Robert L Reinbold | Henning, MN 56551 | $1,485 |
114 | Alan Peppersack | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $1,477 |
115 | Bruce M Jacobson | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $1,476 |
116 | Bruce Veden | Wadena, MN 56482 | $1,476 |
117 | Jake Schultz | Frazee, MN 56544 | $1,459 |
118 | Michael Minten | Perham, MN 56573 | $1,450 |
119 | Daniel L Hanson | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $1,449 |
120 | Lyle Horn | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $1,429 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”