Conservation Reserve Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 847
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $2,340,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Merle Earley | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $5,334 |
102 | Patsie Pastures LLC | Perham, MN 56573 | $5,320 |
103 | Richard Muckala | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $5,316 |
104 | Perham Sportsman's Club | Perham, MN 56573 | $5,251 |
105 | , | $5,251 | |
106 | Bruce K Johnson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $5,201 |
107 | David Koppe | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | $5,189 |
108 | Gregory Gjere | New Brighton, MN 55112 | $5,183 |
109 | Richard A Werner | Perham, MN 56573 | $5,153 |
110 | Steven Smith | Henning, MN 56551 | $5,138 |
111 | Sharon R Steeke | Perham, MN 56573 | $5,136 |
112 | Daniel O Miller | Perham, MN 56573 | $5,069 |
113 | Mark Riestenberg | Perham, MN 56573 | $5,038 |
114 | Brian L Johnson | Kindred, ND 58051 | $5,037 |
115 | Elizabeth F Frye | Minnetrista, MN 55364 | $5,019 |
116 | Ann Roberts | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $4,973 |
117 | Virgil Bernu | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $4,969 |
118 | Rhz Legacy | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $4,968 |
119 | , | $4,958 | |
120 | Delbert Sandback | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $4,949 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”