Direct Payment Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,668
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $17,843,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Michael Ruther | Perham, MN 56573 | $41,004 |
102 | Jorgenson Brothers Farms | Frazee, MN 56544 | $40,786 |
103 | Brent R Tumberg | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $40,769 |
104 | Bolland Brothers | Henning, MN 56551 | $40,670 |
105 | Paul M Klinnert | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $40,405 |
106 | Justin D Malone | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $40,290 |
107 | Tim Volkmann | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $39,928 |
108 | John Pokorney | Bertha, MN 56437 | $39,382 |
109 | Matthew Ruckheim | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $39,341 |
110 | Allen L Pauly | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $38,833 |
111 | Kirk Buehler | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $38,543 |
112 | Duane Sibert | Hewitt, MN 56453 | $38,406 |
113 | Gerald Hanson | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $38,353 |
114 | Leo Tabery | Bluffton, MN 56518 | $37,775 |
115 | Larry Helmrichs | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $37,218 |
116 | Dean Clarksean | Wadena, MN 56482 | $36,936 |
117 | Ronald Sakry | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $36,786 |
118 | Joe Brasel | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $36,639 |
119 | Dennis Fechtner | Perham, MN 56573 | $36,175 |
120 | Ronald Hermann | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $36,009 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”