Production Flexibility Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,580
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $12,822,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Vernon Johansen | Underwood, MN 56586 | $22,079 |
142 | Bradley John Koll | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $22,052 |
143 | Hansen Brothers Dairy | Vining, MN 56588 | $22,002 |
144 | Ronald Hermann | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $21,918 |
145 | Dennis Wendt | Wadena, MN 56482 | $21,640 |
146 | Wm Maunumaki | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $21,586 |
147 | Scott Sibert | Hewitt, MN 56453 | $21,580 |
148 | William Weniger | Bluffton, MN 56518 | $21,503 |
149 | Ronney Malcolm | Richville, MN 56576 | $21,460 |
150 | J M Reineke | Henning, MN 56551 | $21,363 |
151 | Roger Quittschreiber | Frazee, MN 56544 | $21,334 |
152 | David Curtis | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $21,280 |
153 | Leroy Hager | Fargo, ND 58104 | $21,268 |
154 | Richard Frost Estate | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $21,252 |
155 | James Albright | Dent, MN 56528 | $21,163 |
156 | Tom Loerzel | Perham, MN 56573 | $21,153 |
157 | Thomas Mursu | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $20,945 |
158 | Dan Bucholz Gp | Perham, MN 56573 | $20,752 |
159 | Gary Buckmeier | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $20,749 |
160 | Roger Hammer | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $20,722 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”