Production Flexibility Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,580
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $12,822,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Steve Hintzman | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $20,520 |
162 | Kurt Schroeer Jr | Perham, MN 56573 | $20,520 |
163 | Michael Ruther | Perham, MN 56573 | $20,417 |
164 | Robert-robert & Mari Bolland | Henning, MN 56551 | $20,274 |
165 | Russell G Johnson | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $20,120 |
166 | Harold Schossow | Perham, MN 56573 | $20,041 |
167 | Oscar Kawlewski | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $19,995 |
168 | Norman Koehler | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $19,978 |
169 | Charles Schornack | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $19,887 |
170 | Gerald Wanderi | Perham, MN 56573 | $19,612 |
171 | Peter Bakka | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $19,526 |
172 | Hendrickx Bros Dairy Inc | Menahga, MN 56464 | $19,497 |
173 | Mark Moss | Eagle Bend, MN 56446 | $19,438 |
174 | David Tumberg | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $19,405 |
175 | John Papenfuss | Perham, MN 56573 | $19,281 |
176 | Michael Dombeck | Perham, MN 56573 | $19,200 |
177 | Daryl Haarstick | Vergas, MN 56587 | $19,042 |
178 | Larry N Huwe | Perham, MN 56573 | $19,008 |
179 | Gary Hannuksela | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $18,917 |
180 | Lonnie Perrine | Perham, MN 56573 | $18,909 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”