Wool and Mohair Programs in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 77
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $45,374 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Daryl Carter | Battle Lake, MN 56515 | $10,651 |
2 | Lloyd Carter | Battle Lake, MN 56515 | $4,193 |
3 | Duane Bauck | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $2,520 |
4 | Leroy O Nelson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,878 |
5 | Ronald B Parker | Henning, MN 56551 | $1,726 |
6 | Dennis Carlson | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $1,548 |
7 | Howard Legried | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,515 |
8 | Richard Carlund | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,274 |
9 | Albert Huwe | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,185 |
10 | Kenneth Bauck | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,144 |
11 | Donald Bauck | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,083 |
12 | Edgar Hendrickx | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $964 |
13 | Tom Morgenroth | Perham, MN 56573 | $953 |
14 | Lee B Larimore | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $925 |
15 | Arnold Knickrehm | Perham, MN 56573 | $703 |
16 | Darryl Eggert | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $690 |
17 | Roger Berndt | Dent, MN 56528 | $684 |
18 | Robert Keierleber | Henning, MN 56551 | $592 |
19 | Scot Stelter | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $586 |
20 | Harvey J Klever | Henning, MN 56551 | $567 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>