Total Conservation Programs in Pennington County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 215
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Pennington County, Minnesota totaled $1,891,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Agassiz Federal Credit Union ** | Plummer, MN 56748 | $25,869 |
22 | Salvinus Hoffert | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $25,639 |
23 | Garret Reierson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $24,539 |
24 | Revocable Trust Agreement Of Mary L. Reierson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $24,539 |
25 | Roger Nelson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $24,225 |
26 | Ray L Martell | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $20,903 |
27 | Dean H Hanson | Trail, MN 56684 | $20,866 |
28 | Debra Filer | Minneapolis, MN 55441 | $19,784 |
29 | Allan Jesme | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $18,178 |
30 | Tasa Farm LLC | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $18,160 |
31 | Timothy A Olson | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $17,895 |
32 | Kenneth J Asp | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $16,838 |
33 | Jarvis Torgerson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $16,444 |
34 | Dale Donarski | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $16,249 |
35 | Michael S Brandon | Middle River, MN 56737 | $16,022 |
36 | Thomas P Lewis | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $15,780 |
37 | Steve P Jorland | Middle River, MN 56737 | $15,712 |
38 | Hagen Farm Of Gatzke Inc | Gatzke, MN 56724 | $14,110 |
39 | Jeremy J Nelson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $12,874 |
40 | Ricky Smeby | Grygla, MN 56727 | $12,799 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”