Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Pennington County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 110
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Pennington County, Minnesota totaled $198,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Wayne E Swanson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $581 |
82 | Chad S Paulson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $568 |
83 | Ronald E Stucy | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $564 |
84 | Donald Scott Jr | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $532 |
85 | Jessica Alice Hanson | Plummer, MN 56748 | $532 |
86 | Kade M Klasen | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $488 |
87 | Zachariah Olson | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $487 |
88 | River Bend Farms Inc | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $485 |
89 | Spencer Schultz | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $484 |
90 | Mitchell Srnsky | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $483 |
91 | Tim Raiter | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $461 |
92 | Brian Gary Anderson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $431 |
93 | Linda Anderson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $431 |
94 | Danny A Johnsrud | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $422 |
95 | Kiefer A Kainz | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $419 |
96 | Dale Rupprecht | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $385 |
97 | Justin Kiesow | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $381 |
98 | Shane Vettleson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $351 |
99 | Christopher Kiesow | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $350 |
100 | Russell Jasperson | Plummer, MN 56748 | $319 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”