Farm Subsidy information
Pennington County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Pennington County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 558
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pennington County, Minnesota totaled $18,671,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Misty Mehrkens | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $39,096 |
82 | Robert J Miller | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $37,393 |
83 | Alexander L Carlson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $37,350 |
84 | Kjell Filip Hanson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $37,338 |
85 | Thomas G Wold Trust | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $37,035 |
86 | Richard Salentiny | Plummer, MN 56748 | $36,456 |
87 | Deland Bakke | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $36,016 |
88 | Ann Hoffert | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $35,308 |
89 | Edgar J Miller | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $35,054 |
90 | Kevin Sanders | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $34,961 |
91 | David Garry | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $34,709 |
92 | Donald Joppru | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $32,939 |
93 | Benjamin Hanson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $32,620 |
94 | Jms Trf LLC | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $32,550 |
95 | Joel O Stolaas | Oklee, MN 56742 | $32,489 |
96 | Daniel L Aandal | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $32,278 |
97 | Pederson Brothers Partnership | Bejou, MN 56516 | $32,274 |
98 | Noel T Joppru | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $32,200 |
99 | Scott G Olson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $31,964 |
100 | Brent M Philipp | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $31,928 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”