Farm Subsidy information
Pine County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Pine County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,176
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pine County, Minnesota totaled $64,101,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel E Olean | Finlayson, MN 55735 | $171,621 |
62 | John S Grace | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $170,803 |
63 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $165,159 |
64 | Wilfred Kraft Estate | Chanhassen, MN 55317 | $162,246 |
65 | Luoma Egg Ranch Inc | Finlayson, MN 55735 | $159,425 |
66 | Steve Martin | Finlayson, MN 55735 | $158,586 |
67 | Bruce Brown | Rush City, MN 55069 | $155,420 |
68 | Vincent J Merrick | Pine City, MN 55063 | $154,090 |
69 | Douglas Bednar | Willow River, MN 55795 | $150,600 |
70 | Dareld Schoenrock | Finlayson, MN 55735 | $147,371 |
71 | Ken Pirila Jr | Finlayson, MN 55735 | $140,928 |
72 | John Kemen | Braham, MN 55006 | $138,474 |
73 | David Bednar | Willow River, MN 55795 | $138,056 |
74 | Nordrum Dairy LLC | Pine City, MN 55063 | $135,205 |
75 | Michael Patzoldt | Pine City, MN 55063 | $134,255 |
76 | Jonathan P Stevens | Pine City, MN 55063 | $133,973 |
77 | Roger H Teich | Pine City, MN 55063 | $132,682 |
78 | Jerome Effertz | Pine City, MN 55063 | $132,240 |
79 | Scott Hippen | Brook Park, MN 55007 | $132,085 |
80 | Richard R Skluzacek | Pine City, MN 55063 | $131,595 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”