Conservation Reserve Program in Pine County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 59
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pine County, Minnesota totaled $291,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hedwig Wroolie | Braham, MN 55006 | $5,616 |
22 | Thomas E Wachsmuth | Ogilvie, MN 56358 | $5,364 |
23 | Paul E Radzak | Willow River, MN 55795 | $5,325 |
24 | Albert Berg | Pine City, MN 55063 | $4,469 |
25 | Roger A Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $4,453 |
26 | Joseph Klepsa | Brook Park, MN 55007 | $4,295 |
27 | Richard W Lange | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $4,041 |
28 | Heath Blatz | Grasston, MN 55030 | $3,796 |
29 | Matthew Merrick | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,531 |
30 | Robert Kraft | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,376 |
31 | Howard Sizer | Grasston, MN 55030 | $3,267 |
32 | Robert D Pickarski | Pine City, MN 55063 | $2,534 |
33 | Raymond Laska | Finlayson, MN 55735 | $2,510 |
34 | Terry D Lind | Braham, MN 55006 | $2,421 |
35 | Donald Haare | Sandstone, MN 55072 | $2,282 |
36 | Bernard Mikrot | Sturgeon Lake, MN 55783 | $2,103 |
37 | William Joseph Saumer | Pine City, MN 55063 | $2,007 |
38 | James E Harper | Braham, MN 55006 | $1,800 |
39 | Daniel L Peterson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $1,738 |
40 | Larry D Sable | Blaine, MN 55434 | $1,634 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”