Market Gains in Pine County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Pine County, Minnesota totaled $475,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roger A Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $4,733 |
22 | Nordrum Dairy | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,710 |
23 | Richard A Johnson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,312 |
24 | Vincent J Merrick | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,238 |
25 | Dean Larry Heikes | Braham, MN 55006 | $2,938 |
26 | Eileen J Anderson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $2,214 |
27 | Daniel D Eklund | Braham, MN 55006 | $1,771 |
28 | Douglas C Eklund | Braham, MN 55006 | $1,743 |
29 | Erling M Olson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $1,488 |
30 | Michael Long | Pine City, MN 55063 | $836 |
31 | Glenn Nordrum | Pine City, MN 55063 | $777 |
32 | Doug Chouinard | Rush City, MN 55069 | $617 |
33 | Edward E Pangerl | Pine City, MN 55063 | $600 |
34 | Russell Martinson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $570 |
35 | Gerald E Weis Sr | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $501 |
36 | Mark A Carlson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $462 |
37 | Ervin R Stevens Jr | Rush City, MN 55069 | $410 |
38 | David Spinler | Pine City, MN 55063 | $388 |
39 | Scott Downing | Braham, MN 55006 | $381 |
40 | Ronald W Swanson | Grasston, MN 55030 | $241 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”