Total Commodity Programs in Pine County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 219
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pine County, Minnesota totaled $1,891,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steve E Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $24,093 |
22 | Arnold Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $22,902 |
23 | Jason Zastera | Pine City, MN 55063 | $20,577 |
24 | Jonathan C Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $18,643 |
25 | Bradley J Ausmus | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $17,803 |
26 | Bruce Brown | Rush City, MN 55069 | $17,493 |
27 | Michael Saumer | Pine City, MN 55063 | $16,645 |
28 | Douglas P Johnson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $16,429 |
29 | Terry D Lind | Braham, MN 55006 | $16,280 |
30 | Randall Hinze | Pine City, MN 55063 | $16,149 |
31 | Donald E Sikkink | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $15,902 |
32 | Richard Muellner | Rush City, MN 55069 | $15,900 |
33 | Michael Patzoldt | Pine City, MN 55063 | $15,733 |
34 | Jonathan P Stevens | Pine City, MN 55063 | $15,633 |
35 | Lindner Farms LLC | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $15,393 |
36 | Curtis V Kruse | Pine City, MN 55063 | $15,286 |
37 | Daniel C Cabak | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $15,194 |
38 | William J Karas | Pine City, MN 55063 | $15,056 |
39 | Jeffrey S Johnson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $13,867 |
40 | Joseph Smetana | Pine City, MN 55063 | $13,263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”