Total Conservation Programs in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 893
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $24,092,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Harold Jasper Revocable Trust | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $184,416 |
22 | Elvin Beyers | Holland, MN 56139 | $180,472 |
23 | Dennis R Johnson | Tyler, MN 56178 | $178,825 |
24 | Anna Mae Fritz | Holland, MN 56139 | $176,895 |
25 | Larry Hillard | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $175,479 |
26 | Ronald Erickson | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $175,348 |
27 | Donald Kallemeyn | Bigelow, MN 56117 | $175,261 |
28 | Eric J Petersen | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $173,952 |
29 | Douglas A Rupp | Slayton, MN 56172 | $171,040 |
30 | Jo Ann M Rowenhorst | Merrill, IA 51038 | $170,448 |
31 | Francis Bouman Jr | Holland, MN 56139 | $169,916 |
32 | Debra L Spronk | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $166,981 |
33 | Darrell Houselog | Holland, MN 56139 | $166,363 |
34 | Wayne Alderson | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $158,238 |
35 | Dane W De Kock | West Des Moines, IA 50266 | $155,430 |
36 | Darwin Van Essen | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $154,940 |
37 | Fey Farms Inc | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $154,291 |
38 | Gary Vander Top | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $151,087 |
39 | Mark Moeller | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $150,000 |
40 | K & M Enterprises | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $145,143 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”