Loan Deficiency in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,000
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $30,571,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Hiniker | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $130,729 |
42 | Randal T Vanderpoel | Tyler, MN 56178 | $129,960 |
43 | Paul Nelson | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $129,946 |
44 | Alan Vander Lugt | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $128,716 |
45 | James B Griebel Farms Llp | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $124,770 |
46 | Roy Stevens | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $124,583 |
47 | Richard Kas | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $124,171 |
48 | Roger Kas | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $124,000 |
49 | Degroot Farms Inc | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $122,846 |
50 | Jerald Davids | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $121,349 |
51 | Curt Hess | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $121,214 |
52 | Tom Nelson | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $121,096 |
53 | Merle W Jasper | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $120,618 |
54 | Dale Schuld | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $120,310 |
55 | William Arens | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $119,509 |
56 | T & R Farms | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $118,622 |
57 | Steve Paulsen | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $118,411 |
58 | James Nelson | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $116,854 |
59 | Visma Farms | Leota, MN 56153 | $115,732 |
60 | Ronald Rollefson | Ward, SD 57026 | $110,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”