Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 528
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $21,816,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Daniel James Folkerts | Jasper, MN 56144 | $108,679 |
42 | Alan Vander Lugt | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $107,616 |
43 | Bradley Tuinstra | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $107,600 |
44 | Seth Christensen | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $106,714 |
45 | Bradley Kruisselbrink | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $105,039 |
46 | David Heard | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $104,582 |
47 | Todd R Miller | Jasper, MN 56144 | $103,275 |
48 | Calvin Burggraaff | Holland, MN 56139 | $102,978 |
49 | Kenneth Christensen | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $100,203 |
50 | Dean A Tuinstra | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $98,380 |
51 | Michael Jasper | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $96,799 |
52 | Mr Jerry Clyde Van Hoecke | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $95,844 |
53 | John Rice | Brandon, SD 57005 | $95,826 |
54 | Mary D Rice | Brandon, SD 57005 | $95,817 |
55 | Nokomis Farms Llp | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $95,810 |
56 | Ron Boeke | Verdi, MN 56164 | $95,781 |
57 | Wesley Dekam | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $92,880 |
58 | Jeremy S Van Essen | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $92,227 |
59 | Todd Alan Van Essen | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $91,284 |
60 | Thomas Griebel | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $91,067 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”