Farm Subsidy information
Pipestone County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 717
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $17,872,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Brian Kas | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $39,643 |
82 | Ronald Larry Brecher | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $39,453 |
83 | Kaleb J Kracht | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $39,118 |
84 | Robert Jasper | Balaton, MN 56115 | $39,052 |
85 | Todd A Alderson | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $38,411 |
86 | James Nelson | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $37,967 |
87 | Corey Dennis Johnson | Dundas, MN 55019 | $37,493 |
88 | Michael John Fruechte | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $36,308 |
89 | Calvin Burggraaff | Holland, MN 56139 | $36,224 |
90 | Ellefson Farms Inc | Flandreau, SD 57028 | $36,000 |
91 | R & R Acres Inc | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $35,863 |
92 | Fritz Farms Llp | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $35,270 |
93 | Dennis Lee Johnson | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $34,670 |
94 | Sharon Kay Johnson | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $34,196 |
95 | Gary Gorter | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $33,722 |
96 | Brian Winsel | Holland, MN 56139 | $33,698 |
97 | Schneider Dairy Cattle Inc | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $33,382 |
98 | Chad Alan Borman | Holland, MN 56139 | $33,252 |
99 | Kyle Dewilde | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $32,753 |
100 | Michael Nelson | Holland, MN 56139 | $32,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”