Conservation Reserve Program in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 227
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $812,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Eugene Halbur | Jasper, MN 56144 | $2,950 |
82 | Shane Cowell | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $2,950 |
83 | Johansen Family Limited Partnership | Hawick, MN 56273 | $2,834 |
84 | Diane Scotting | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $2,742 |
85 | Joel Minett-joel Minett Revocable Trust | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $2,718 |
86 | Cheney Lee Vander Top | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $2,648 |
87 | Vincent T Vander Top | Champlin, MN 55316 | $2,648 |
88 | Donald Kallemeyn | Bigelow, MN 56117 | $2,576 |
89 | Paul Kallemeyn | Jackson, MN 56143 | $2,576 |
90 | Fred Vander Stoep Trust | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $2,572 |
91 | Seth Christensen | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $2,546 |
92 | Scott Haarsma | Holland, MN 56139 | $2,544 |
93 | Kenneth Christensen | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $2,441 |
94 | Leone Meyer | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $2,306 |
95 | Jerald Von Holtum | Eldorado, OH 45321 | $2,287 |
96 | Beth Jasper | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $2,260 |
97 | Brian Deweerd | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $2,260 |
98 | Darrell C Amundson | Balaton, MN 56115 | $2,149 |
99 | , | $2,105 | |
100 | Joyce Dykstra | Minneapolis, MN 55407 | $2,078 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”